Robert Breaker claims Ruckman from 1995 to 1998 preached that A. confession was a work and B. the only thing that could save you was mental assent in believing in Jesus shedding his blood. FALSE. Dr. Ruckman from 1950s to his death taught that there were two conditions to being...
Thank you to Brother Don Nesbitt, the Lord's bloodhound. The Lord put it on my heart to write what I have.I am not claiming that all of these men are in the Mandatory Vocalization Club (check my youtube, TylerMcLaughlin-t1n if that confuses you). This article exists for people to compare...
Notice the theological differences. Dr. Peter S. Ruckman views it as something that is asked privately of God; Ambrosiaster and Origen view it as a public profession."Verse 10: ‘For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness...’ Works are not a point at issue. ‘...and with the mouth confession is made...
“And here it comes: the simplest, clearest presentation of salvation found anywhere in either Testament. Two conditions: If. ‘If thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus,’ number two, ‘And shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.’ No ifs,...
Robert Breaker (the cloud church) claims there is a distinct Dr. Ruckman of the 60s-80s that preached confession was a work and that mental assent in the abstract belief of God's blood is enough to save you from hell. Peter Ruckman did not teach this.I would like to thank God...
I’d like to thank the Lord’s bloodhound, Brother Don Nesbitt w46try7. The Dr. Ruckman commentary comes from him. Dr Ruckman, Romans Study, 28 & 29 Dr. Ruckman claims ancestry from the Antiochene school of thought, and I believe this is true. This is Dr. Peter S. Ruckman’s commentary on Romans...
I would like to thank Brother Don, the Lord's bloodhound for Song of Solomon and the Romans study from him. I would like to thank Water in the Wilderness for providing the other 1960s-1970s clips! Both are great guys. Check them out!And finally, I would like to thank Brother Ed...
Robert Breaker of the Cloud Church claims that Dr. Peter S. Ruckman changed from the late 1990s to the 2000s, and (this is not true, as we have a complete historical record from the 1950s to the 2000s) that Breaker claims falsely that he changed his own views from a...
According to Robert Breaker’s salvation doctrine, taken to its logical conclusion, it teaches that Dr. Peter S. Ruckman was not saved.I would like to thank Brother Don again for alarming us to Breaker’s beliefs which contradict Dr. Ruckman. I am not responsible for finding that out. The credit goes to...
Dr. Peter S. Ruckman and Pastor Robert Breaker of the cloud church (of the cloud church) do not agree on salvation.If you have stumbled upon this article and you don’t know what a Robert Breaker or a Dr. Ruckman is. Or you do and is confused why it exists.Dr. Ruckman...