Introduction Few questions in patristic theology are as contested, or as consequential, as the relationship John Chrysostom draws between faith and works in the appropriation of salvation. Modern interpreters tend to read him through one of two lenses. The first, favored by contemporary Eastern Orthodox writers, treats his more process-oriented...
The preceding essays in this study have argued that John Chrysostom held salvation to be received immediately, through faith and a verbal calling upon Christ, and subsequently maintained or forfeited according to the life that follows. That argument has so far left one body of evidence untouched: Chrysostom's own statements...
Thank you to Brother Don Nesbitt his youtube handle is @w46try7. the Lord's bloodhound. He is one of the reasons, this article exists.If you look at my profile, you will see I wrote a study of Diodorus of Tarsus's soteriology, and you will see in it, I made the argument...
This has every single Diodorus of Tarsus, or some say Diodore of Tarsus commentary on Romans side by side with the adjacent John Wesley Romans commentary.As Diodore of Tarsus only quoted on parts of Romans. John Wesley's commentary will only be on the same verses. If John Wesley didn't have...