Ezekiel’s Prophetic Commission – Part 1
Years ago, I served as a curriculum writer for the Sunday School Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, where I developed Spanish-language lessons to help adult Sunday School teachers prepare their classes. One series of lessons focused on the book of Ezekiel. I have since translated these lessons into English, updated the content, and reformatted them as essays. The complete series of Ezekiel studies can be found in my post “Studies on the Book of Ezekiel.”
This post examines the prophetic calling of Ezekiel as recorded in Ezekiel 1–3, analyzing the theological significance of his commission as a messenger to the Babylonian exiles. Through careful exegesis of the inaugural vision, divine commissioning, and symbolic acts of preparation, this study explores how Ezekiel’s calling establishes paradigmatic elements for prophetic ministry in contexts of displacement and rebellion. The analysis demonstrates that Ezekiel’s experience provides both historical insight into sixth-century BCE Judahite exile and theological principles for understanding divine communication in crisis situations.
Introduction
The prophetic literature of the Old Testament contains numerous accounts of divine calling, yet few are as elaborate and theologically complex as that of Ezekiel, son of Buzi. Called to ministry among the Babylonian exiles following the first deportation of 597 BCE, Ezekiel received one of the most detailed commissioning narratives in biblical literature. His calling, recorded in the opening chapters of his book, establishes fundamental principles about prophetic authority, divine communication, and ministerial faithfulness that extend far beyond his immediate historical context.
This post examines Ezekiel’s prophetic commission through careful analysis of Ezekiel 1:1–3:15, with particular attention to the theological themes of divine transcendence, prophetic authority, and ministerial preparation. The study argues that Ezekiel’s calling narrative serves as a paradigmatic account that illuminates both the nature of prophetic ministry and the character of divine communication in contexts of crisis and displacement.
Ezekiel and the Babylonian Exile
Ezekiel’s prophetic ministry must be understood within the broader context of the Babylonian exile, one of the most formative periods in Israelite history. The prophet was among the first wave of deportees taken to Babylon in 597 BCE, following Nebuchadnezzar II’s conquest of Jerusalem and the surrender of King Jehoiachin. According to 2 Kings 24:14–16, this initial deportation included approximately 10,000 individuals from Judah’s political, religious, and artisan classes. It was a deliberate strategy by Nebuchadnezzar to remove potential sources of rebellion while preserving the economic infrastructure of the conquered territory.
The biblical text indicates that Ezekiel belonged to the priestly class (Ezekiel 1:3), which would have placed him among Jerusalem’s religious elite. His inclusion in the first deportation suggests he held a position of some significance within the temple hierarchy. This background is crucial for understanding both his theological perspective and his authority among the exiled community.
Life in Babylonian Exile
Contrary to popular assumptions about ancient captivity, the biblical and archaeological evidence suggests that life for the Judahite exiles in Babylon was relatively stable. The deportees were settled in agricultural communities along the Chebar River (Ezek 1:1), a major irrigation canal connecting to the Euphrates River system. The location, known as Tel-abib (Ezek 3:15), appears to have been an established settlement where exiles could maintain their cultural and religious identity.
Ezekiel’s personal circumstances reflect this stability. The text indicates he was married (Ezekiel 24:15–18), owned a house (Ezekiel 3:24), and served as a recognized leader among the exiles, as evidenced by the elders’ visits to his home (Ezek 8:1; 14:1; 20:1). This context of relative prosperity and cultural autonomy is essential for understanding the nature of Ezekiel’s prophetic challenge: he was called to minister to a community that, while physically displaced, had not necessarily abandoned hope for restoration or acknowledged the theological implications of their exile.
The Vision of Divine Glory (Ezekiel 1:1–28)
Ezekiel’s inaugural vision is precisely dated: “In the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, on the fifth day of the month, as I was among the exiles by the river Chebar, the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God” (Ezekiel 1:1). The dual dating system, the thirtieth year and the fifth year of King Jehoiachin’s exile (v. 2), has generated considerable scholarly discussion.
The reference to the “thirtieth year” most likely indicates Ezekiel’s age when he was called, a detail particularly important because of his priestly background. According to Numbers 4:3, 23, 30, Levites begin full temple service at age 30, the same age at which priests assume their full duties. This coincidence suggests that Ezekiel received his prophetic calling exactly when he should have started his priestly service in the Jerusalem temple, highlighting the irony of his exile and displacement.
The Theophanic Vision
Ezekiel’s vision of divine glory draws upon established biblical traditions of theophany while introducing distinctive elements that reflect his particular theological concerns. The vision begins with conventional theophanic imagery: a storm wind from the north, accompanied by a great cloud with flashing fire and surrounding brightness (Ezekiel 1:4). These elements echo earlier manifestations of divine presence, such as the Sinai theophany (Exodus 19:16–19) and Elijah’s encounter at Mount Horeb (1 Kings 19:11–13).
The vision’s most distinctive feature is the complex description of four living creatures (Ezekiel 1:5–14), later identified as cherubim (Ezekiel 10:20). Each creature possesses four faces: human, lion, ox, and eagle, representing the pinnacle of creation in their respective domains: humanity, wild animals, domestic animals, and birds. This imagery communicates God’s sovereignty over all created order, a theme particularly relevant to exiles who might question divine authority in a foreign land.
Above the living creatures appears a firmament supporting a throne of sapphire, upon which sits a figure with human appearance, surrounded by fire and rainbow-like radiance (Ezekiel 1:22–28). This anthropomorphic description of divine presence, while drawing on earlier biblical traditions (cf. Exodus 24:10; Isaiah 6:1), presents unique challenges for interpretation, particularly regarding the relationship between divine transcendence and immanence.
Theological Implications of the Vision
The inaugural vision establishes several crucial theological principles that govern Ezekiel’s subsequent ministry. First, it demonstrates divine mobility and accessibility. Unlike temple theology that emphasized God’s localized presence in Jerusalem, Ezekiel’s vision reveals a God who can manifest divine glory anywhere, including the “unclean” land of Babylon. This mobility theology becomes central to Ezekiel’s message of judgment and restoration.
Second, the vision emphasizes divine sovereignty over historical events. The elaborate throne-chariot imagery suggests that God directs the course of history, including the exile itself. This perspective challenges any interpretation of exile as divine abandonment or weakness.
Third, the vision establishes the prophet’s credentials through direct divine encounter. Ezekiel’s authority derives not from institutional appointment or inherited office but from immediate divine commissioning, validated by his extraordinary visionary experience.
The Prophetic Commission (Ezekiel 2:1–3:15)
Following his overwhelming encounter with divine glory, Ezekiel receives his prophetic commission through a series of divine addresses. The initial command, “O mortal, stand up on your feet, and I will speak with you” (Ezek 2:1 NRSV), introduces the distinctive title “son of man” (ben-adam) of the Masoretic text, which appears ninety-three times throughout the book.
This title emphasizes Ezekiel’s humanity in contrast to the divine glory he has witnessed. Unlike the messianic usage in Daniel 7:13–14 or the New Testament Gospels, Ezekiel’s “son of man” designation underscores his creaturely status and mortality. The title functions as a constant reminder of the vast distance between the divine commissioner and the human messenger.
The Spirit’s enablement (Ezek 2:2) shows that prophetic ministry needs divine power. Ezekiel cannot complete his mission with just human strength; he requires the same Spirit that energizes the visionary creatures to do his work. The role of the Spirit in prophetic vocation reveals a central principle: true ministry flows from God’s power, not personal capability.
The study of Ezekiel’s call and commissioning will continue in Part 2.
Claude Mariottini
Emeritus Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, you will enjoy reading my books.
VISIT MY AMAZON AUTHOR’S PAGE
BUY MY BOOKS ON AMAZON (Click here).
NOTE: Did you like this post? Do you think other people would like to read this post? Be sure to share this post on Facebook and share a link on X so that others may enjoy reading it too!
If you are looking for other series of studies on the Old Testament, visit the Archive section and you will find many studies that deal with a variety of Old Testament topics.







