Debunking Robert Breaker’s Fake "Mountain of Evidence" (Dr. Ruckman "preaching the blood" Audio)
Robert Breaker (the cloud church) has been taking Dr. Ruckman out of context, again...
I'd like to thank God for giving me wisdom, understanding and discernment. Alongside, blessing me in my compilations of Dr. Ruckman.
I'd like to thank Brother Don for making the video about Romans 10!
I'd like to thank Brother Ed for even telling me in the first place, that I should make that comparison and encouraging me.
I'd like to thank Brother Jeremiah 33:3 for helping me with my audio, and getting me acquainted with recording my voice. UPDATE: I do not associate with Jeremiah 33:3 anymore.
I'd like to thank Dr. Ruckman for preaching.
I'd like to thank Charles Spurgeon that despite him being a Calvinist Baptist, that he is actually of use to Bible Believers right now.
And I'd like to thank you for watching.
[On-Screen Text]:
THIS VIDEO ALSO APPLIES TO ANY AND ALL FUTURE CLIPS ROBERT BREAKER WILL UPLOAD
OF RUCKMAN “AGREEING” WITH HIS DAMNABLE HERESIES
IT ALSO APPLIES TO ANY UNADDRESSED ONES AS OF 3/30/2026.
Comment by Don Nesbitt (13 days ago):
"Got a 3 fold ISSL coming up. Added the 3rd one, because the “Bible Believers”
in 2026 are NOT what they were in 1996. We got much dross within the camp
today!"
Reply by @McLaughlin-t1n (2 weeks ago):
"Amen Brother. To think we have 'Bible Believers' who say Romans 10 is 'mostly'
for Jews because Joel 2:32 and Romans 10:13 have nearly the same wording.
Despite Paul saying saved not delivered."
Narrator:
On March 15th, 2026, I commented on brother Don Nesbitt's post that was about
the chaff of Bible believers.
(Reading comment) "Amen brother. To think we have 'Bible Believers' who say
Romans 10 is 'mostly' for Jews because Joel 2:32 and Romans 10:13 have nearly
the same wording, despite Paul saying saved, not delivered."
This made Don Nesbitt upload his own study, which proves this false doctrine.
Robert Breaker was known to do, after being challenged theologically, you retreat
to Dr. Ruckman. Breaker will immediately say Ruckman did whatever Breaker was
being challenged on.
[On-Screen Text]:
“All of your publicity-mad little nobodies, (trying to hotdog it all the time),
only want to be recognized as SPIRITUAL LEADERS. To do this, you are forced to
associate yourself sooner or later with “Ruckman.” You all have to hang on my
shirt tail to get a hearing in the Body of Christ. Evidently, “Ruckman” must be
in the spotlight since all of you are struggling to get into it”
, Dr. Peter S. Ruckman to Robert Breaker, April 2010.
Narrator:
For more on that, watch my 1980s compilations. Robert Breaker mentioning Peter
Ruckman and riding his shoestrings after Ruckman died in 2016, and 113 times
in 2018. Breaker posted two videos of Dr. Ruckman, quote-unquote "affirming" his
beliefs on the blood.
[On-Screen Text]:
He also did youtube shorts about this.
Narrator:
I'll let the two videos play, but remember, when you listen to them, Dr. Ruckman
does not teach what Breaker teaches: that faith plus works is a sin that will
damn you to hell.
[01:19 – 01:41] Clip: Robert Breaker (January 22, 2026)
Robert Breaker:
That's a very shallow presentation of the gospel. And that's not reading the
context. The context is: “How shall they call on him in whom they have not
believed?” You see, you have to believe. It's through faith that we're saved.
It's not through works of saying something, and it's not through faith plus
saying something, and it's not through faith plus saying something.
[01:41 – 02:09] Narrator Commentary
Narrator:
Dr. Ruckman does not teach that you have to mentally trust in the blood of
Christ alone to save you. And if you do not mentally trust in the blood of
Christ alone to save you, as Robert Breaker teaches, hell for you, amigo.
No, he says preaching the blood of Christ is something that will never stop. Dr.
Ruckman, at the end of this video, says that to receive the blood, you have to
vocally confess.
[02:10 – 02:20] Clip: Peter Ruckman
Dr. Peter Ruckman:
How you ever get saved? If you ever get saved, you are saved by grace through
faith in the shed blood of Jesus Christ. And if you haven't been saved that way,
you've never been saved. You've had something else.
[02:21 – 02:32] Note on Sources
[On-Screen Text]:
I cannot find the full context of either of these statements, as Robert Breaker
does not put his sources in his description.
However, I do for every 1950s to 2000s compilation.
And, I only do free videos, so that you can VERIFY what I am telling you is
right.
[02:33 – 03:16] Clip: Peter Ruckman on the Blood
Dr. Peter Ruckman:
Can you understand how, why, how and why we say the blood is precious? If you ever
hear me deny the blood of Christ, you'll know I've been tortured, and that I'm
insane.
If you ever hear me deny the blood of Christ, you'll know somebody has taken
my, my mind from me. No man in his right mind would think of turning down an
offer like that. Nobody. Nobody. If I got my right sensibilities about me, I can
say honestly, I wouldn't trade the blood of Jesus Christ for anything material
or immaterial that exists in this universe. That's what's going to get me home
to God, regardless of any condition.
[03:16 – 04:58] Breaker’s Pinned Comment & Rebuttal
[On-Screen Text]:
FYI, you won't be able to find this. The comment was deleted. Whether by Breaker
or the commenter, I do not know.
@danellogue3702: "Isn't that sweet? Kind of like apostates pulling verses out of
context... Play the whole message so followers can get the context of what he
was preaching about."
Narrator:
Well, Robert Breaker got pushback, obviously. And with this pushback, I'll read
the comment:
(Reading Robert Breaker's reply)
"How about we play ALL of HIS MESSAGES! When you do, you see him saying it RIGHT
(like this at times), and then saying it WRONG (like 'come to God the best way
you know how,' or 'just ask God to save you,' or 'repeat this prayer) at times.
The truth is my Dad and I heard him say it RIGHT when he said it right, and we
heard him change and say it wrong when he said it like others said it with the
modern Mandatory Vocalization Cult teaching. So, if you want context, how about
all of his videos? Then you'll see what me, my Dad, and many others saw as we
went to his school (And I graduated. I have the diploma on my wall!)"
Narrator:
Uh, I'm stopping reading this for a second.
[On-Screen Text]:
Dr. Ruckman saying that he wouldn't trade the blood of Christ for anything, or
him saying that the blood of Christ saves you does not contradict him preaching
vocal confession.
Even that aside, nowhere in the videos does he state how to receive that blood.
Robert Breaker III saying that the clips mean he believed in mentally assenting
to the blood of Christ is eisegesis as Ruckman never states how.
Narrator:
I have 1950s to 1960s to 1970s to 1980s to 1990s to 2000s compilations of Dr.
Ruckman preaching the sinner's prayer. What Robert Breaker defines as "getting
it right" is Peter Ruckman just saying he will never stop preaching about the
blood. None of that, what Robert Breaker says is Dr. Ruckman "getting it
right", is mutually exclusive with the sinner's prayer.
For reasons like I elaborate more in the video: when I got saved, Gene Kim told
me that Jesus Christ died, buried, and rose again so His blood could wash away
my sins. And then he told me I vocally receive that by saying a sinner's prayer.
That's Dr. Ruckman "getting it right" [and it] doesn't contradict, and I'm saying
"getting it right" in quotations because he's just preaching the blood, and the
blood is not mutually exclusive with sinner's prayers. Robert Breaker saying
that the blood and the sinner's prayer is mutually exclusive is false. We do not
teach that, and nor in Dr. Ruckman's theology is it.
[04:58 – 05:46] Is Praying a Work?
[On-Screen Graphic]:
Thumbnail: Is Believing a WORK? (Heart + Work) | Debunking the “Prayer is a
Work” Heresy...
Narrator:
The entire idea that they are exclusive comes from Robert Breaker thinking the
sinner's prayer is a work. I did an entire video about that about the heart
laboring, and the Bible also says the heart works. And Robert Breaker says, "Oh
well, there's works versus labors in prayer, that means praying is a labor, so
it's a work." Well, the King James Bible also says the heart works. Are you
teaching universalism at that point? Because if you can't pray and you can't
believe, I guess you can't really do much. No, you don't. But Robert Breaker,
like Greek scholars, doesn't make himself approved unto God.
[05:47 – 08:14] Reading the Rest of Breaker’s Comment
Narrator (reading Breaker's comment):
"The truth is my Dad and I heard him say it RIGHT when he said it right, and we
heard him change and say it wrong when he said it like others said it with the
modern Mandatory Vocalization Cult teaching. So, if you want context, how about
all of his videos? Then you'll see what me, my Dad, and many others saw as we
went to his school (And I graduated. I have the diploma on my wall!) The Truth
is there is a CHANGE in his ministry from 'TRUST THE BLOOD'..."
[On-Screen Text]:
He never believed in trust the blood I.E. Breaker's blood mental assent.
Narrator (continuing reading):
"...to 'JUST ASK GOD TO SAVE YOU' the older he got. That's just sad. If you are
interested in truth (which you probably aren't by your little smug remark about
calling me some 'apostate'), then how about reading why I left Ruckman's church:
[link] I gave a mountain of evidence to prove that he once preached it right,
but then he and those following him changed. Are you interested in truth? Listen
bud, this is not an issue of 'he said one thing and someone else said another!'
Did you actually LISTEN to what Ruckman said? This is salvation for all
eternity! Heaven or Hell. Either you are saved by faith in the blood, or you
aren't. And, if you aren't you got something else. Something that won't save
you! So, are you trusting the 'something else'? If so, I truly feel sorry for
you! I hope your hell isn't as hot as others. And I will see you at the
Judgment. I won't be saying 'I told you so!' I'll be the one in tears crying for
you, wishing you'd had listened!"
[08:14 – 08:48] Breaker's Father Auditing Classes
[On-Screen Text]:
If you cannot read this, (what I am talking about) reads.
"My dad went there as well (in the late 70's and 80's but didn't graduate. He
already had a degree, so he just audited classes)."
Narrator:
Now for those who haven't been to college, and that's including myself, Robert
Breaker's dad just audited. Auditing means that you attend a college lecture
without earning credit or a grade. You literally just observe classes for free.
Which makes, you know, auditing classes for free from the late 1970s to
early 1980s very unlikely, especially with Dr. Ruckman seeing as it's his
perfect right to charge tuition.
[08:49 – 10:56] Clip: Don Nesbitt – Dr. Ruckman, Jubilee '90 (Part 2)
[On-Screen Text]:
[He's speaking of Hamites]
Dr. Peter Ruckman:
Some of these fellows come down to go to school, I tell them this: I tell them,
"Now you've got your civil rights. And if you want to, you can shut this place
down tomorrow night." And they're Christians. Usually they say, "Well, I
wouldn't want to cause no trouble."
And I said, "Okay, you've got your rights to come, and if you want to enforce
your rights, you can enter the Justice Department, and that's the end of the
school."
"Well, I wouldn't want to cause no trouble."
And I told them, I said this: "I'll tell you what I'll do. If you give up your
civil rights to come on this campus, I'll give up my civil rights to charge you
for classes. I've got a perfect right to charge you for classes, everybody else
pays for classes. I'll tell you what I'll do: I'll teach you the material, the
same material my students get for nothing, in your homes."
And we tried that. I had one old boy, I taught him, I gave him private
instruction for almost a year and a half. He made A's in Hebrew, he made A's in
Greek, he could play the piano, he could play a violin, he had all my tapes. And
I'd go down the colored section and sit there in the kitchen and teach him there
with his family at night. That fellow came within six months of graduating, and
suddenly began to get kind of bummy-looking and kind of seedy-looking, and then
he was never there when I came by his house.
Pretty soon I said to his wife, I said, "I can't keep coming down here if he
ain't going to show up." And after about a couple more months he didn't show up
at all. Then one day when I was driving downtown, I looked out of the corner of
the car, looked down the, I was driving this van, car comes alongside of me.
Here's this fellow, I think his name was Lemuel Perry from Cleveland, and he was
messing around with a little old 13-year-old boy there in the car. That old boy
dropped out of school six months before he was to graduate, and never heard of
him again.
I thought to myself, "Boy, we got one this time, he'll really go." But he
didn't. Tell you what else we did: rented a building downtown, paid the rent,
told all those fellows, "We'll give you free textbooks. Charge you a dollar an
hour and give you free textbooks to study, and we'll send instructors down to
you, white instructors." That thing stayed open about eight months. It started
with about 10 preachers, five preachers, one preacher, no preacher, with the
bills paid for.
And I've been through this thing over and over and over and over, and I've come
to conclusions that are not going to shake me, brother.
[10:56 – 11:53] Narrator Commentary
Narrator:
I'm doing a separate video on that and Robert Breaker's dad's time in PBI. His
mountain of evidence is either out-of-context quotes or a fabricated quote.
Watch Jeremiah 33:3's video on either of those.
Either way, Robert Breaker has increasingly been posting more out-of-context
quotes where Dr. Ruckman praises the blood due to Don Nesbitt challenging him,
and you know what he does. Now, there are two ways to interpret this:
The right way, which is taking into consideration every single recorded footage
of Dr. Ruckman from the 1950s to the 2000s, the decade when he died, and when he
talked about the blood and mandatory vocalization in receiving it. Because we
have clips from 2013 of Dr. Ruckman preaching the same thing he preached in
the 1950s.
[11:54 – 13:19] Clip: Peter Ruckman – Sin as a Serpent (1950s)
Dr. Peter Ruckman:
Because the Bible says God is a Spirit, and they that worship Him must worship
Him in spirit and in truth. Do you see this two-edged sword he has? That
two-edged sword is the Word of God, because the Bible says the Word of God is
quick and powerful and sharper than any two-edged sword.
Do you see this? This is prayer. Because the Bible says: "Whosoever shall call
upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." And that, my friend, is how to get
deliverance from sin. Call upon His name, believe His Word: "For faith cometh by
hearing, and hearing by the Word of God."
And lest we Christian people should be wise in our own conceits, let me say
this: every Christian has a besetting sin, and we get deliverance from our sin
the same way unsaved people get deliverance: through prayer and the Word. For
the Bible tells us to cast all our care upon Him, for He cares for us.
Now may God help you Christian people to read your Bibles and pray, and love the
Lord Jesus in sincerity and truth. And may God help you unsaved people listening
to my voice right now to bow your head there by your television set and receive
Him as your Savior the best way you know how. He's risen, He's living, He loves
you, He'll save you.
[13:20 – 15:13] Clip: Dr. Ruckman Answers Breaker in 2013
[On-Screen Text]:
Ruckman died 3 years later in 2016. We have footage from his 30's (1950s) to 3
years before his death, of him preaching a mandatory vocalization.
Dr. Peter Ruckman:
"...not of the world, even as I am not of the world." What you going to do with
that? You're not going to talk about it.
I haven't heard one man say yet what happened to a fellow if he didn't accept
the arrangements that God made for paying for his sins. I've heard him talk
about this atonement, you know, paying all your sins, all your sins are all
taken care of, everything's okay, God took care of it a thousand years ago. Hey,
bud! Why don't you tell them how that love show is out if they don't accept it?
You never mention that, do you? You've got to accept what He did. They're trying
to make you think that He did what He did whether you accept that or not. Well,
you can stand and say, "Well, I believe that," and then go right on living like
you're living and wind up in hell.
You're not going to get to heaven just cause you believe in your head one or two
things God said in that book. To get to heaven, you've got to accept the one who
made the atonement.
Now, we have a bunch of nuts today that think that if you pray and ask God to
save you, and come to Him and pray to Him and ask Him to save you, that's works,
so that doesn't count, that doesn't save you. When that book says: "Whosoever
shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."
Those people are what you call head people. They believe that if you assent to a
thing intellectually in your head and believe it as it's stated, that that takes
care of things. It doesn't if you reject the one that did it.
You want to see John 3:16 in action? Just remember that the majority of any
population in any century, the majority does not accept it, because they don't
accept the one that did it.
[15:14 – 22:40] Clip: Ruckman Denounces Breaker (2010–2011)
[On-Screen Text]:
I can prove he’s talking about Breaker. From my video “Dr. Peter S. Ruckman
names and Denounces Breaker 2010-11”
(Displays "The Books of 1-2-3 John, Jude" MP3 audio cassette/CD cover)
Dr. Peter Ruckman:
I beseech you, I beg you. How do you do that? Well, you're to call, you're to
receive His Son. You can't get the content of that verse unless you receive the
one who did it! The one who reconciled you is Christ. If you don't accept Him,
you are not reconciled!
And boy, if they can't get that thing screwed up. You are saved when, the
touchstone of that Bible is when you receive Christ. That's it!
Why, how many of you people have doubted your salvation at least once or twice
since you were saved? Let me see your hands.
Well, brother Breaker, who graduated from this school and is trying to sell his
own Mexican Bible right now, has gone all over the country saying, and I've got
it in print, that if you doubt your salvation, you've never really been saved.
So, you know what they do? His kind of people, and they've got a missionary
conference coming up here this week, I think, bringing all these fellows around
to teach this junk. And what they're telling you is that if you doubt your
salvation, you couldn't have really been saved. Well, that's a crock!
They take the passage in Romans that says: "Whosoever shall call upon the name
of the Lord shall be saved." You know what I've heard him do? Old Dewey over
there? He goes back in the Old Testament and says to call upon the name of the
Lord is not a reference to you getting saved, because everybody in the Old
Testament when they called upon the name of the Lord, it was just to save them
from some kind of trouble.
But boy, all of Romans 10 is on salvation! Nobody's praying about trouble. "If
thou shalt believe in thine heart that God raised Him from the dead, thou shalt
be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; with the mouth
confession..." The mouth! The mouth, the mouth, the mouth! Not the mind, not the
head, the mouth, buddy! The mouth! And with the mouth confession is made unto
salvation. "For whosoever shall call upon..." Mouth, buddy! Call upon the name
of the Lord, shall be saved.
Now what they're doing is saying this: you went down here and date of dedication
Bible school, maybe didn't understand it, and probably some of those aren't
really saved, probably they didn't understand it. But when I get up here and
preach the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ to anybody, I'm preaching
the gospel. Death, burial, and resurrection. And I'm asking them to believe that
Christ died for their sins, was buried, and rose again the third day from the
dead. Now, if they hear that and want to express their belief, they come down,
and they kneel, and they ask God to save them.
Hugh Pyle said to me, "Do you believe this Bible is the Word of God?"
"Uh-huh."
"You believe you're a sinner?"
"Uh-huh."
"You believe God can save a sinner?"
"I guess He could."
"You believe He could save you?"
"I don't know. I guess He could."
"Would you ask Him to save you?"
"Sure."
"Take my hand."
I took his hand. He said, "Now, just in your own words, ask Christ to save you."
Why? "Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." So I did.
And I didn't know I was saved! All I knew was I was going to hell and didn't
want to go to hell. And he told me if I believed on Christ to call upon His
name, He'd save me, so I did. And he said, "Now you know you have eternal life,
don't you?"
I said, "No."
Well, you don't come out of the life I came out of in an hour or 15 minutes! And
he said, "Well," he said, showed it to me: "These things have I written unto you
that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have
eternal life..." "Do you believe on the name of the Son of God?" He didn't say,
"Did you believe that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself?" He
never mentioned it! He said, "Do you believe on Christ?"
I said, "Yes."
He said, "Then don't you know you have eternal life?"
I said, "Well, I guess so."
"Well," he said, "then you know so. Do you know or don't you?"
"No, I don't know!"
And I finally said I did know when I lied. I didn't know!
But you see, these boys, they think they're just too smart. They can tell who's
saved and who's not, this bunch of junkies, you know. But I couldn't tell I was
saved, but boy, that's when I got saved! I found out that later when I got
assurance.
Assurance of salvation, brother, is not salvation. Salvation can often come and
you won't have assurance. Or you have assurance, and then some of you thought
you lost it, and lose assurance.
Fact, faith, feeling, that's salvation. You can't go by Second Corinthians alone,
because there it's already done, and if you haven't accepted Christ, you haven't
done nothing.
Fact: here's the fact. The fact is if you have trusted Christ as your Savior,
believing He died, was buried, and rose from the dead, you are saved and going
to heaven. And if you doubt the rest of your life, it won't do you any
good, you'll just get gray hairs for nothing, because you're going home to
heaven. That's all there is to it. Whether you doubt it or not.
Faith, that's how you know you're saved. Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by
the Word of God. That's when you know you're saved, when you believe what He
said. If you don't believe what He said, you'll always have your doubts.
Feeling, that isn't even connected. That's the fruit of salvation. That isn't the
root, that's the fruit.
But brother Breaker and these boys got this idea: if you weren't saved like I
was saved... Well, all of them got saved when they were about 8 or 9 or 10 years
old and didn't understand it, and when they got to living like the devil when
they were teenagers, they got under conviction out reading the Bible, and then
is when they thought they got saved! That's when they got assurance!
And what they try to do is make retreads out of you people. They go around the
country and try to talk everybody out of their salvation so they can say, "Well,
he was really saved under my preaching. That thing back there in Sunday school
when we went forward to take the preacher's hand, that didn't count." That's
what they're doing.
I didn't mean to get preaching, but let me tell you: the touchstone of that
Bible is not baptism, that can't always settle it. You might have been saved
before that, maybe you weren't. The touchstone is not even just what you just
believe. The people at Pentecost were all saved, and none of them knew anything
about the imputed righteousness of Christ! Peter never mentioned the blood in
the whole chapter! He didn't mention Christ dying for anybody's sins in Acts
chapter 2! And they all got saved and got the Holy Spirit!
And didn't have any assurance, because nobody even talked, why, he didn't talk
about the blood atonement in Acts chapter 3! He said your sins will get blotted
out when the Lord comes back. Peter didn't know they were blotted out now, after
he'd been preaching for two or three years! But they were saved right then when
they did what? When they received Christ!
It's when you receive Christ you're saved. And when you receive Christ, you
receive Him. "Come in. I accept you. I want you. I need you. Please help me."
You go to Him, and you receive Him. And when you receive Him, you get the whole
luggage, baggage luggage, because He brings it with Him. When you take Him, you
take the imputed righteousness of God, and you've got God's righteousness. It's:
when did you receive Him? That's when.
[22:40 – 25:17] Summary of the Two Positions
[On-Screen Text]:
First way: Dr. Ruckman taught mandatory vocalization of Romans 10 throughout his
entire life. Even a guided prayer throughout his entire life. And he'd mention
the blood in the prayers, see my compilation posted after this.
Meaning, the blood of Christ is received through prayer.
Wrong (Robert Breaker's) way: I believe that to be saved, you must mentally
assent to the blood of Christ.
Dr. Ruckman preached about the blood of Christ, so that means he agrees with me!
Narrator:
Which would, oh, I don't know, kind of say that he taught it his entire life?
The wrong way, which is Robert Breaker's way: the first way is this: you believe
that the blood of Christ washes away your sins, and the blood is amazing, and we
love it. But the way you receive that blood is by vocally asking God to receive
it.
Robert Breaker will attempt to deceive you and say, "Well, Dr. Ruckman preached
about the blood," and then he will use that, well, Dr. Ruckman preached about the
blood, and then he will use that to say something that Dr. Ruckman did not
actually agree with. He will use a clip of Dr. Ruckman preaching the blood, and
then he will say, "Well, Dr. Ruckman believed that you have to mentally trust in
the blood of Christ alone to save you." And he taught that in
the 1950s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s.
No, he did not, Breaker! Like, watch my videos. I've done you a courtesy of
including every article. Yes, Ruckman said that, but he did not stop there. Dr.
Ruckman believed and taught in his preachings that the way to receive that blood
is through vocally asking God to save you. Like Charles Spurgeon taught, watch my
video and my YouTube shorts: Charles Spurgeon is in the Mandatory Vocalization
Club.
Dr. Ruckman preached about the blood, but he did not preach that for salvation
you must mentally assent to only the blood of Christ, to only trusting the blood
of Christ for salvation.
[25:18 – 26:36] Satan's Method of Misquoting Scripture
[On-Screen Text]:
Psalms 91:11-12 – “For he shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee
IN ALL THY WAYS. They shall bear thee up in their hands, lest thou dash thy foot
against a stone.”
How satan quoted it:
Matthew 4:6 – “And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down:
for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their
hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a
stone.”
Narrator:
What did the devil do when he tempted the Lord Jesus Christ? What did he do?
This is the original verse, Psalms 91:11–12... Satan omitted "in all thy ways."
[On-Screen Text]:
Proverbs 3:6 – “In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.”
Narrator:
Look at this cross-reference in Proverbs: "In all thy ways acknowledge him, and
he shall direct thy paths." "In all thy ways" is a conditional statement. It is
not an unconditional where you can jump off a building and God will protect you.
God would not want that. The original verse is God protecting him under a
condition. And Satan uses this nugget of truth to then lie and omit "in all thy
ways," and say that Christ could jump off a building and just kill Himself.
See what Robert Breaker does? Compare that to him.
[26:37 – 28:47] Comparison to Breaker's Tactics
[On-Screen Text]:
Omits that he preached mandatory vocalization to receive that blood.
“You have always preached a lousy “Milton Gospel” established in your hometown,
(Milton, Fla.)...” , Dr. Peter S. Ruckman explaining to Robert Breaker why he
(among other reasons) was kicked from the PBI mission board. See video I made
called “Dr. Peter Ruckman's 2010 Letter to Robert Breaker” for more.
“Your position is so apparent that it is disgusting. There is nothing in
anything you write that mentions LOST Hispanics or SOUL winning. Your MOTIVE of
getting embroiled in an intellectual discussion over versions is ROTTEN. You are
simply making a name for yourself by riding on the spirituality of “OTHERS.” In
this case, Reyes, Park, Gomez, McArdle, and others.”
“YOU, yourself, have never produced anything. Now you are trying to get
publicity by attacking BOOKS SO YOU CAN SELL YOUR OWN BOOKS, that is, according
to your books which you sent me.”
Narrator:
He takes Dr. Ruckman preaching the blood and then omits that, and uses it to lie
that Ruckman believed in his doctrine about mentally assenting to trusting the
blood of Christ for salvation, and not receiving the blood of Christ through a
mandatory vocalization, and not receiving the blood of Christ through vocally
asking God for it.
He uses that to say, "Well, if you haven't done that..." and Dr. Ruckman called
him out on this: "If you haven't done what I did, you aren't saved, and you
aren't going to heaven." There's nothing new under the sun. There's a difference
between a person saying how wonderful the blood of Christ is versus saying that
you are damned and you are on your way to hell if you do not obey the Milton
Gospel where you mentally trust in the blood of Christ for salvation.
[On-Screen Graphic]:
Article: Mouth Confession; Heart Belief – C.H. Spurgeon
Narrator:
I was saved by Gene Kim, like I said earlier in the video. I was a destitute
boy, and he led me to Christ. He told me Jesus Christ died, was buried, and rose
again so His blood could wash away my sins, and I had to trust in that blood
alone to save me from hell. That's far more blood-centric than most sinner's
prayers. But did he end it there? No. He then told me I had to receive that
blood atonement by vocally confessing.
What Robert Breaker does with Dr. Ruckman is like if someone took Gene Kim alone
saying that Jesus Christ died, was buried, and rose again so His blood could
wash away your sins, and then just clipped it there:
[28:48 – 30:16] Clip: Pastor Gene Kim
Pastor Gene Kim:
Good works can never save you. Jesus is God who died, buried, and resurrected so
that He can pay all the sins for you. You don't have to pay a single sin for
yourself. So all you have to do as a repentant sinner is turn to what He did on
the cross alone for your salvation. You might say, "Well, Pastor, I do believe
only on what Jesus did on the cross to save me." That's great!
Narrator:
Gene Kim saying that you had to vocally confess, to vocally ask God to save you:
Pastor Gene Kim:
Then all you have to do is just say that to the Lord. You might say, "Well,
preacher, I haven't prayed much before in my life. I don't know really how to
say it to God. Can you help me out?" Sure, you can say it this way:
Dear God, I know I'm a sinner. As I repent, I put my faith that Jesus is God,
and that He died, buried, and resurrected so that His blood can wash away my
sins. I put my faith in that alone to save me, not my good works. In Jesus' name
I pray, Amen.
Congratulations, my friend. If you meant it with all your heart that you put
your faith only on what Jesus did on the cross through His blood to save you,
then you are saved.
[30:16 – 33:10] Addressing Don Nesbitt & Ruckman's Letter
[On-Screen Graphic]:
Don Nesbitt YouTube Channel Page
Narrator:
I'll say a few more things before I let Dr. Ruckman play and him talking about
the blood and the sinner's prayer.
Robert Breaker is doing this in response to a person who is one of the biggest
Ruckman archivists. I'd say Don Nesbitt is at least the top two Ruckman
collectors. Don Nesbitt knows what Dr. Ruckman did or did not teach. Breaker is
attempting to convince an archivist who knew and wrote to Dr. Ruckman, gave him
his own Bible that Ruckman used until his death, and convinced Dr. Ruckman to
change a position that he believed theologically, that Dr. Ruckman did not teach
what's readily found in Dr. Ruckman's 1950s to 2000s archives.
Robert Breaker is trying to actively portray a man who he knows did not like
him, Ruckman mocked him, his dead father, he said a lot of things that weren't
nice things.
[On-Screen Text]:
Not saying that Dr. Ruckman wasn't justified in saying not nice things. I am
only pointing out that he did so.
From the 2010 letter:
“WE dropped you because:”
“1. You lied about being a pastor at Garcon Point”
“You didn't win a soul to Christ the entire time you “pastured” either in
Honduras.”
“2. You did not really pastor anyone in Honduras”
“You did exactly what you are doing now---traveling back and forth to the
States. THEN you were doing it to visit your girlfriend. You are now doing it to
establish yourself as an authority on foreign translations---as a “saviour” to
Hispanics.”
Narrator:
And yet Breaker is attempting to publicly own an archivist who knows right from
wrong, that the man whom Don Nesbitt has spent his life watching and archiving,
based on two out-of-context clips that do not even contradict Dr. Ruckman's
stated theological salvation doctrines found in his sermons where he taught. And
Breaker is using those to teach that Dr. Ruckman taught that to be saved, you
must mentally assent to only the blood of Christ for salvation, and you will
burn in hell if you do not solely trust in that blood of Christ alone.
A man who Robert Breaker knows did not like him, who mocked Breaker, who said
Breaker didn't win a single soul in all of his time in Honduras, who kicked him
out as a PBI missionary, who publicly named and denounced him in teachings, and
who Robert Breaker was so afraid to mention that he only mentioned Ruckman after
his death in 2017, Ruckman died in 2016, but I'm saying he only mentioned him
in 2017.
[On-Screen Text]:
Dr. Ruckman writes SO MUCH MORE, but he writes so much against Breaker that you
need to watch the letter video.
Narrator:
In other words, how about we play all of his messages? How about we play every
message of his with a sinner's prayer mentioning the blood of Christ, or him
mentioning receiving the blood of Christ in reference to a sinner's prayer?
[33:10 – 33:57] Breaker's Other Ruckman Clips
[On-Screen Text]:
Breaker's other Ruckman clips.
“Peter Ruckman Say Whaaaat???”
Ruckman in it says “Faith is acting on what you believe. And in the case of
believing on Christ, faith is acting on what God said and taking Jesus Christ as
your savior, taking him by an act of faith and trusting his shed blood for the
remission of your sins and trusting nothing else.”
And we can very clearly understand “taking Jesus Christ” as your savior means a
physical action, as archives show him preaching confession as a requirement.
And again, what Ruckman says is not mutually exclusive with a vocal confession
interpretation of Romans 10.
See my previous note on it.
[33:58 – 35:01] Clip: Ruckman on Faith
Dr. Peter Ruckman:
Now that's faith. The Bible speaks about faith as a grain of mustard seed,
having faith as a little child. You exercise faith when you go out to your car
and get in it and turn the ignition on. You think it'll start. Why, if you
didn't think that, you wouldn't have turned the key.
You see what I mean? Faith is acting on what you believe. And in the case of
believing on Christ, faith is acting on what God said and taking Jesus Christ as
your Savior, taking Him by an act of faith and trusting His shed blood for the
remission of your sins, and trusting nothing else.
As the songwriter said, "My hope is built on nothing less than Jesus' blood and
righteousness. On Christ the solid rock I stand, all other ground..." Even
scriptural alibis. "...all other ground is sinking sand."
Faith is not the blind act of the soul. Faith in God rests upon the best of
evidence: the infallible Word of the living God.
[35:02 – 36:06] Context on the Clips
[On-Screen Text]:
“Peter Ruckman Say Whaaaat???” was on January 23, 2026.
“Ruckman Says You Must Come Through Calvary!” was on January 27, 2026.
(Both of those titles have hashtags, I am not including for space. See
description for full titles.)
I will allow the second video to play, but I want you to keep these things in
mind.
Dr. Ruckman saying that his prayer can't save you doesn't mean that he doesn't
believe in a vocal Romans 10 interpretation. He means that you can't pray for
someone to get saved, and have them magically get saved. It is a conscious
choice. Pre-emptively retorting that one.
And with him saying, you have to come through Calvary. Again, he taught the way
to receive Calvary was through faith + confession. Such as Spurgeon taught.
[36:06 – 36:48] Clip: Ruckman Preaching (Calvary)
Dr. Peter Ruckman:
Raise your hand right now and say, "Preacher, I'm not saved, but I understand
what you said. I'd like to be a Christian. Would you pray for me? Would you
raise your hand up, let me pray for you?" Anyone like that here tonight?
My prayer can't save you, but it can help. Help. Anybody like that here tonight?
Your good life can't save you. God's made the sacrifice. You'll have to come His
way. He dictates the terms of mercy. Not of him that willeth, nor of him that
runneth, but the God that showeth mercy. And God will show you mercy at Calvary
and no place else.
Is there a hand here tonight? If not, we'll close.
[36:49 – 37:05] Closing Remarks
[On-Screen Text]:
Do I need to say anymore, that I haven't said?
Everything I have said in this video about the first two clips, applies to the
rest of Breaker's clips of Ruckman.
See previous notes.
Citations:
Don Nesbitt's community post
https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxcYh05-6ermvM2JiV3t6Y7N3qW_NJAJCj?lc=UgxXsmvvO9E--HIZRdh4AaABAg
My comment on Don Nesbitt's community post
https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxcYh05-6ermvM2JiV3t6Y7N3qW_NJAJCj?lc=UgxXsmvvO9E--HIZRdh4AaABAg
Don Nesbitt - Paul to Who
Robert Breaker - The Mandatory Vocalization Cult #sinnersprayer #confession #falsedoctrine #mouth #vocal #salvation
https://youtu.be/b8j-ol-hslI?si=hdozH9U0Y4OUWwEI&t=622
Robert Breaker - Proof Peter Ruckman Taught Faith in the Blood! #peterruckman #ruckman #ruckmanite #faithintheblood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFPRfRUbq4M
Robert Breaker - Was Peter Ruckman Completely Insane? Not when he Preached the Blood!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ax_aJQgXRTQ
Robert Breaker - Peter Ruckman Says You Are Only Saved by Faith in the Blood!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/31TCW4NH4WE
Robert Breaker - Was Peter Ruckman Insane? Not if he preached the blood!!!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LLAyumsgeTM
Daniellogue3702 comment
Unable to be found
Dr Ruckman, Jubilee 90' (P2) AUDIO Q & A
https://youtu.be/mqehtkcgqUs?si=HmqIrQ4_p1u5bU1L&t=753
Jeremiah 33:3's channel
Update: I do not associate with Jeremiah anymore.
https://www.youtube.com/@Jeremiah333-JesusSaves
Dr. Peter S. Ruckman - Sin as a Serpent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCuPZ2yLRO8&t=723s
Dr Ruckman answers Breaker in 2013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhWhPlLzw0k
Dr. Peter S. Ruckman names and Denounces Breaker 2010-11
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kbd4CaypttU
https://kjv1611.org/products/1-2-3-john-jude-mp3
Mouth Confession; Heart Belief
C.H. Spurgeon
https://sermonindex.net/speakers/ch-spurgeon/mouth-confession-heart-belief/
How to Be Saved and a REAL Bible Believer- Dr. Gene Kim
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdLpUfsXAuM&t=70
Robert Breaker - Peter Ruckman Say Whaaaat??? #faithintheblood #bloodofjesus #truesalvation #atonement #ruckmanite
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHaxkaYaAZk
Robert Breaker - Ruckman Says You Must Come Through Calvary! #peterruckman #ruckmanite
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHGzOsR0PAw
#donnesbitt #peterruckman #ruckmanite #ruckman #breaker #robertbreaker #theblood #bloodatonement #kingjamesbible #kjvonly #kjb #kjvbible #sinnersprayer #howtobesaved #howtogotoheaven #heaven #salvation #saved #jesus #jesuschrist #jesuslovesyou #christian
