Robert Breaker accused Dr. Peter S. Ruckman of domestic violence
Thank you to Brother Don Nesbitt, the Lord's bloodhound for initially sounding the alarm about Robert Breaker of the Cloud Church. His youtube handle is @w46try7.
This is dedicated to Robert Breaker, accusing Peter Ruckman of Domestic Violence.
[00:06]
The wife beating comment is SHOWN AT 12:21.
[00:11]
On January 12, 2026, a person commented on Breaker’s latest video. In the video,
Breaker claimed that Dr. Ruckman’s condemnation to Catholic confession was
actually regarding the ‘sinner’s prayer’ confession.
The commenter shared a link to a video from 2010–2011 in which Dr. Ruckman
denounced Breaker.
[00:34]
@jawobskurn-q9t
Here is your pastor speaking about you.
@jesusspotts
- Here's what he said 15 years ago, I got you!
- Point in a video posted on here that Breaker has said that Ruckman is
accusing him of.
I'll wait.
[00:56]
Robert Breaker joined the conversation and wrote a reply of over 5,000 words to
the second commenter. There is no point in me providing a full rebuttal, as
anyone who has watched my entire filmography already knows the answer.
[01:13]
Breaker claims that Dr. Ruckman got confused and lumped him in with someone
else. This is false; in a letter from 2011 that Breaker himself shared, Dr.
Ruckman explicitly condemned him.
In fact, Dr. Ruckman, by Breaker's own admission, cannot be confused.
[01:34]
The comment will be shown in its entirety.
The accusation of wife-beating occurs at the 12:21 mark.
[01:43]
@Robertbreaker3
@animejefftv MUST READ IF YOU WANT THE TRUTH... How interesting. First, he's not my Pastor. But, my old Pastor. Now, thanks for posting this. I just listened to it. Wow! Hard to believe that's the Ruckman I knew. What I see is Ruckman erroneously lumping me in with a Church in Milton (called Faith Baptist Church) where Dewey Marrs was once Pastor. But, I was NOT a part of that church, nor did I have anything to do with Dewey. (I did meet him once. Nice guy). Dewey was on the radio preaching all the time. What he preached was backwards to me (and apparently to Ruckman too). That church said the whole world was already reconciled to Christ. They always went to 2 Cor. 5:19 and changed "reconciling" to "reconciled." I don't see that. And, they'd never read the next verse: "Be ye reconciled to Christ!" That is a sinner must accept it, so Ruckman said that right! And, that's what I preach too! You must appropriate the atonement by faith!
[03:02]
So, why did Ruckman say that about me when it's simply not true? I think he was confused and tried to lump me in with people I didn't agree with who lived in the same town as me. How sad.
I don't know what he meant about me saying if you doubt you're saved then you aren't. I don't ever remember saying (or printing) that. I wish he'd given the source. If he was perhaps referring to my book: "The Heresy of the Sinner's Prayer," then I took his assistant Pastor's advice and rewrote some things in that book. So that would be very deceitful on Ruckman's part if that's what he was referring to, as he knew I changed some things in that book, as I gracefully took their counsel and made it read more clearly so no one would think what he said is something I was teaching. So, why would he say that, and why would he attack me? (Read the book here for free if you want: https://www.rrb3.com/mypub/books/hrsy_sin_pryr.htm )
I do remember hearing that Dewey's church said if you doubt it then you might not be saved for doubt is the opposite of faith. Thus, that Church taught if you doubted your salvation you were damned (Rom. 14:23) or LOST! But, I'm not a part of that church. Again, Ruckman erroneously thought I was. Why didn't he investigate to find out? Why would he say something that wasn't true?
[04:39]
All I know is I've never doubted my salvation AFTER I got saved by faith in the blood. Before I was saved, I doubted every night, so I "prayed the prayer over and over." But, I was still lost. I was trusting in the prayer I SAID instead of the blood God SHED! And, I remember my Ruckman telling us over and over when I sat under him, IF YOU TRUST THE BLOOD YOU'LL NEVER DOUBT IT. Why is he now preaching you are saved by what you SAY?
Also, my own "Mexican Bible?" What??? That's the Valera 1602 Purificada, which is a Bible that RUCKMAN SUPPORTED and mailed CHECKS to help them do the translation work. I have copies of it and his sending $ to Bro. Park and the church in Monterrey for the translation. So, that's a strange thing to say. Again, doesn't make sense. Did he not investigate? Why would he say that?
Yet, the Valera 1602 Purificada is the best and closest Spanish Bible to the King James. You'd think Ruckman would be all in favor of it. (He was at one time, and sent money to support their work).
To learn more about this Spanish Bible go to: www.rrb3.com or www.thespanishbibleissue.com (I won't get into how I wrote four books about the Spanish Bible, and how McCardle LIED to Ruckman to try to get him to accept the corrupt critical text 1865 Spanish Bible. That's another story for another day).
Also, I'm not selling it to make money. It's printed and available here: www.Valera1602.org And, it's way better than the ecumenical 1960 Spanish Bible, which every time a copy sells, the POPE gets 5% as a Jesuit helped with its translation. But, I guess Ruckman didn't know ANY OF THAT, as he doesn't speak Spanish! (Yet I preach a new sermon in English and Spanish each week).
Again, thanks for sharing this audio sermon, as it clearly shows Ruckman HAS CHANGED from what he preached in this audio sermon I presented. In this sermon Ruckman said you are NOT saved by your CONFESSION. Rather you are saved by BELEIVING and faith in the shed blood.
But in your audio sermon (toward the end of his ministry) he said something very, very different. He's saying in your audio sermon that you're saved BY YOUR MOUTH and your confession. But, that's not what he said in this video. So, the man changed what he once preached. And, thanks for showing that. It is very sad!
That's one of several reasons why I left Ruckman's Church. If you want to see why, go here:
https://www.rrb3.com/Left/reasons_left_church.htm
[09:53]
So, I greatly appreciate your comment and your posting that video which shows Ruckman as a double-minded and unstable man who taught two different plans of salvation. There was younger Ruckman who usually said it right, and older Ruckman who often said it very differently.
Oh, one more thing. In your audio video he said he was saved in the radio station with Hugh Pyle. Do you know there exists another version of his testimony where he says he wasn't saved then, but a few weeks later when he read the Bible and trusted the blood. So, which was it?
Early Ruckman taught salvation by BELIEVING FROM THE HEART or by FAITH IN THE BLOOD. Older Ruckman changed and taught only the Rom. 10:13, 9,10 WITH YOUR MOUTH stuff. (The Hyles 1,2,3 Repeat after me stuff!) Obviously he changed. And that can't be denied if anyone watches these two videos.
And, that's why there are those out there claiming to be "Ruckmanites" who are attacking me. They are believing they are saved by what they said with their MOUTHS and not believing in the blood with all their heart. They trust the modern "new-fangled gospel" instead of the true BLOOD-STAINED GOSPEL. How sad. They follow older Ruckman and don't ever look at younger Ruckman. I wonder why?
So your bringing this out will hopefully help a lot of people.
As for me, I've seen a lot of people get saved by preaching the true gospel of faith in the blood. In fact, my posting this audio sermon of younger Ruckman led to someone getting saved! (See their testimony in the comments, as I pinned it!)
If you want to follow Ruckman, help yourself. I've disassociated myself with Ruckman and now you know why. I saw him change what he used to preach. And, your audio sermon you presented and my audio sermon I presented clearly show that change.
[12:21]
Also, he said some things, like what he said in this following sermon, that are so atrocious that I can't be a part of that. You watch this and tell me if you think this is a good thing for a "pastor" or for any "gentleman" to say about his wife or wives...
I would never "slap my wife around" or "punch my wife in the teeth" or "throw her out and dump garbage on her." I can't have a man like that as my Pastor. Would you? Seriously. Would you follow a man who said that?
Again, I do appreciate Peter Ruckman as a Bible teacher for teaching me the Bible. And, I will stick with the BOOK (KJV). When I went to school, I actually listened to him. On orientation day he said three things:
- The most important thing is your relationship with Jesus Christ, so make sure you maintain that and stay close to him in your daily walk!
- You are NOT me so don't act like me, behave like me, or talk like me! Be yourself and serve God being who you are in your own way!
- Watch out for E.C. Moore and the Hyperdispensationalists!
That was his advice to us students on the first day, and I have not forgotten it. I greatly appreciate his stand for the KJV and his teaching me the Bible. But, I can't change like he did to preaching the mandatory vocalization cult. So, I stand on the blood, the book, and the blessed hope, and I can't change, like his assistant pastor, to a mid-trib rapture. I'm sticking with the PRE-TRIB rapture, as I was taught in school, and like he had in his old SERMONS AND OUTLINES book.
Anyway, thanks again for your post! God bless, and I hope you are SAVED, SURE, and SERVING, and are pointing people to Christ crucified.
Oh, if you want to see what life was like in Honduras, I kept a Honduran journal for 5 of the 7 years I was there. It's found here:
https://www.rrb3.com/tsam/honduras/hond_jrnll_menu.htm
I present this as Ruckman sent dirty letter to me claiming I: "never started any churches in Honduras and never won any souls there." Good thing I kept a daily journal that proves otherwise! I hope you read it. It's always good to check BOTH SIDES before you believe something. Amen? For: "He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him." - Proverbs 18:13
Sincerely,
Robert Breaker
Also, he's using it out of context. If you watch that video, you will know he falsely accused him.
In it, Dr. Peter S. Ruckman says of his first wife at 1:52.
"And the Bible said, "Art thou bound to a wife? Seek not to be loosed." So, I stayed married. I knew it wasn't going to work. Couldn't possibly work. I never loved the girl. The whole time, we were married about 16 years. She did all the giving, I did all the taking. And after I WAS SAVED, I never stepped on her again, never beat her up again."
And of his second wife at 9:34. (WHICH IS EXTREME HYPERBOLE)
""You know what you did, sister? You broke your marriage vows. We got up there, and we said, 'For better, for worse, till death do us part.' And you busted your vows." And she said, "I did not." She said, "You busted yours." I said, "I I'm not even held another woman's hand or winked at a woman since we've been married. I've been true to you." And she said, "Yeah, but you didn't cherish me." And I said, "Lady, See, I'm just sharing some it personal things here. It's kind of help you out. It's trying to help you. Trying to help you." And I said, "Lady, the only thing I didn't do for you was take you and knock your teeth out, and bust your nose, and throw you out in the front yard, and dump a can of garbage on you." That's the only you needed that you didn't get. And that was the truth. But you couldn't do that. I'm a Christian. I can't do that. Go banging a woman around, dumping garbage on her."
Second, Dr. Peter S. Ruckman did not mistake Robert Breaker. He directly named and identified his theology. See my previous letter.
Third, who's more reliable, the missionary board that is supposed to oversee missionaries or the missionary who is supposed to be overseen? The man who has everything to lose by admitting the Mission Board was right, or the missionary board whose job is to hold missionaries accountable?
Analyze the interests of both parties.
The missionary board's interests are to make sure missionaries are acting according to its standards.
Robert Breaker's interests involve his entire person and character, if the mission board is right, it is devastating.
"3. You have always preached a lousy 'Milton Gospel' established in your hometown, (Milton, Fla.)..." - Dr. Peter S. Ruckman in a letter to Robert Breaker from 2010, https://archive.is/1Ub0P
Fourth, Dr. Peter S. Ruckman has no reason to lie in a letter that Robert Breaker was kicked out. Why would he lie and write it, if Robert Breaker voluntarily left?
Again, whose interests don't conflict?
What does Dr. Peter S. Ruckman stand to gain in a letter lying that Robert Breaker was kicked out of Pensacola Bible Baptist Church?
What does Robert Breaker stand to gain in making sure that he wasn't involuntarily kicked out by the missionary board and out of church, and that he rather, according to himself, left?
A man who constantly uses Dr. Peter S. Ruckman's authority.
What does he have to stand to gain?
